At Prime Peer, we follow a transparent, ethical, and rigorous editorial process to ensure the integrity and quality of all manuscripts submitted for publication.
Upon successful online submission of a manuscript, an official acknowledgment is sent to the corresponding author, confirming receipt of the article.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a dual-layer plagiarism screening process using iThenticate and manual cross-verification by our editorial staff. Manuscripts with significant duplication or unethical content will be immediately rejected without review.
Those passing the plagiarism and Pre-Quality Control (Pre-QC) check will move forward for editorial consideration.
The manuscript is then assigned to an Editor with domain expertise who evaluates the manuscript based on:
The assigned editor holds the authority to accept, reject, or recommend revision based on the preliminary review.
If the manuscript passes editorial scrutiny, it is forwarded to 2–3 expert reviewers for double-blind peer review. Reviewers are asked to:
Revised manuscripts are reassessed by the handling editor and, if necessary, sent back to the original reviewers for final evaluation. Only upon satisfactory resolution of all critical issues, the manuscript will be accepted.
Note: The Editor’s decision is final at all stages of the process, including post-review disputes or appeals.
Once accepted, the manuscript enters the production phase:
Prime Peer is committed to a 14-day fast-track peer review process*, enabling rapid editorial decisions while maintaining high scholarly standards.
*Timeline depends on timely reviewer response and complete author submission.